The effects of tether pretension within vertebral body tethering on the biomechanics of the spine: a Finite Element analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78256932

Abstract

 This study investigates the biomechanics of the spine after insertion of vertebral body tethering (VBT) with different cord pretensions. For that purpose, a Finite Element model of the average thoracolumbar spine was stepwise calibrated and validated. The VBT instrumentation was inserted in the left side of the L1-L2 segment with different cord pretensions. As a second test, the L1-L2 segment was submitted to an external pure moment of 6 Nm in left and right lateral bending. The range of motion (ROM) for the spine with VBT was determined with respect to its initial post VBT position. Pretension forces of 100 N and 300 N resulted in a change of scoliotic angle of 2.7° and 5.3° to the left side of the spine, respectively. The ROM of the native spine was 4.5° in right lateral bending and reduced to 1.8° and 1.4° for the cases of the spine with a cord pretension of 100 N and 300 N, respectively. In left lateral bending, the absolute ROM of the native spine was 4.6°. For the cases of a cord pretension of 100 N and 300 N, the spine bent 1.9° and 0.8° to the left side from its initial post VBT position, respectively.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-13

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).