COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF FLAT SLABS: INFLUENCE OF RIBS AND FLEXURAL REINFORCEMENT ON SHEAR STRENGTH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78256128Abstract
A GREATER NUMBER OF STRUCTURES ARE BEING BUILT WITH FLAT REINFORCED CONCRETE SLABS BECAUSE THEY OFFER SEVERAL ADVANTAGES. HOWEVER, MANY DESIGNERS ARE STILL UNSURE ABOUT THE TYPE OF SLAB THAT HAS THE BEST STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE AND WHICH BUILDING CODES PROVIDE THE BEST STRENGTH ESTIMATES. THIS STUDY PRESENTS NONLINEAR COMPUTER SIMULATIONS OF 16 FLAT REINFORCED CONCRETE SLABS UNDER SYMMETRICAL PUNCHING: 4 SOLID SLABS, 4 WAFFLE SLABS WITH WIDE BEAMS, AND 8 WAFFLE SLABS WITH DIFFERENT NUMBERS OF RIBS SUPPORTED IN THE SOLID AREA OF THE SLAB. GEOMETRIC LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT RATIOS RANGED FROM 0.45% TO 1.97%.  THE RESULTS SHOWED THAT SOLID AND BEAMED SLABS ARE MORE RESISTANT, AND NORMATIVE ESTIMATES OVERESTIMATE THEIR STRENGTHS, WHILE THE OPPOSITE OUTCOME WAS FOUND FOR WAFFLE SLABS, WHOSE ESTIMATES PROVIDED IN THE CODES WERE RATHER CONSERVATIVE. THE MOST ACCURATE CODE WAS EC2, FOLLOWED BY ACI 318 AND NBR 6118.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).